Hard to read exactly what you mean. If it is that would I disregard the manufacturers maintenance schedule and either service the item or service it more frequently to extend it's life, then yes. My vehicles range from 1963 to 2010 so I have some maintenance experience and life prolongation skills. When I did my apprenticeship, an abiding lesson learnt was the boss's instruction that when you didn't have a spare part, "make a bastard" and we did. Exactly to spec. Not a skill around today.
Manufacturers are marketing a vehicle life range, i.e. Audi with the Q4 etron at 8 years / 160,000 Km. At that point will any owner spring for a complete new battery pack in an older car?. Bit like saying to us older folk that you need a new engine every 160,000 Km. Maintenance won't help a battery pack life that much, might shorten it but not lengthen it.
Seems VW are also suggesting that your transmission needs no maintenance for the life of the car whereas other users of that same transmission are told to maintain it. That seems to me that VW are setting a life limit on their badged product. Yep, the knowledgeable amongst us will do a fluid and filter change but there is a whole world out there who are not particularly knowledgeable in these days of dumbing down.
So, in essence, all I am doing is drawing attention to how various manufacturers see the lifespan of the vehicles they sell, using an example that has been under robust discussion. My views on the topic aren't really germaine.