Just ordered Hankook Dynapro ATm in the above size. Shouldn't be over the top big. looks like a little increase in sidewall height. Anyone have experience w/ this tire?
Narrower is quite definitely right, and deeper sidewalls too, but going smaller than the original overall wheel/tyre diameter does not improve the ability to cut through snow.Smaller and Narrower have always been the choice for snow and ice. Check out WRC races in Finland and Sweden.....The theory is that the smaller contact patch will push through the soft unstable layers of snow to the harder surface below to give better traction. This allows the studs to "bite" into the ice and harder surface below. Wider tires will push and plow the upper, loose layers. This makes it steering, stopping very difficult.
airjammer--Here you go--ChrisJust ordered Hankook Dynapro ATm in the above size. Shouldn't be over the top big. looks like a little increase in sidewall height. Anyone have experience w/ this tire?
I want these tires on my next go 'round. Thanks for the tip. I've been watching these tire threads closely because the revo 2's don't come in the stock size. I'm not sure which size I'll choose but I'll figure that out when the time comes.krussellm said:I recently fitted my 04 V6 with 265/65r17 Bridgestone Dueler Revo 2's. Sadly, I can't comment on snow handling, but I will say I think I went too big. My V6 lost some of its snapiness and it doesn't corner quite as well being nearly a inch higher. They look a little gaudy in sport mode, but fill out the wheel wells nicely in auto-offroad. I would like to add that I would definitely by these tires again, just in a smaller size.
Damn dude thats an awesome pic!airjammer said:Behind my house overlooking the Gunnison River.
255/65/17 on Canyon rims. This was a good investment.