Club Touareg Forum banner

Volo Chip Review

21K views 24 replies 12 participants last post by  Brendanm  
#1 ·
I saw the Volo chip being discussed a few weeks ago on other forums and decided to order it.

I got the VP12, which is the more performance oriented. They have other ones available too, the FS2-HHO (for HHO generators) and FS3 (oriented towards fuel saving).

It hooks up to the wires leading to the OBD port and sends signals to the ECU apparently.

Installation was tricky and I was weary at first knowing how complicated the Touareg is and how it might not work.

Results:

Per the manual, you should see visible results within 300 miles or more, mine was instant.

Their website has a little calculator that determines how much of an increase in horsepower you could get, mine was 20, same for torque.

A high flow filter (such as a K&N) is recommended.

I definitely noticed a 20+ increase, especially in torque. The car has a lot better pickup.

I would get around 12/14mpg city (lead foot) and 16/17 highway. I now get 17 city and 23+ highway at 70mph.

I'm not completely sure what this would be called, a chip I guess.

The chip changes the air/fuel ratio "aggressively" and the timing, if the conditions are warrant.

"The Volo Chip is not a sensor signal modifier. Instead, sensors are read normally by the ECU and only the ECU's calculated fuel delivery and timing values are altered. Sensor signals are not intercepted and therefore sensor array is irrelevant, as long as they are functioning, factory equipped sensors. This process ensures the Volo Chip will never trigger a check engine light."

"The Volo Chip is an actual microprocessor that communicates with the ECU to safely increase fuel efficiency and power. The Volo Chip reads the ECU and only the ECU's calculated fuel delivery and timing values are altered Other "performance chips" that connect to the IAT are in fact resistors and will damage your engine."

"The chip will not affect any other electronic systems, displays, safety features, etc. All it changes is your ECU's calculated fuel delivery and timing values. While your MPG meter should remain accurate for the most accurate results we recommend doing a hand written calculation as your MPG meter takes several variables."

"It does not affect any safety features, it only alters fuel delivery and timing values in the temporary memory of the ECU."

And according to Kevin, who's the boss around Volo, it will not cause damage what-so-ever.

I'll continue to keep this topic updated.

If anyone is interested, I will post a DIY, since the Touareg is a tricky car it can be a bit tricky to install. The wiring is a bit different, I needed to contact the company and ask since the OBD-II port is different than most cars.

I also have a $10 coupon if anyone is interested. It'll run you just under $100 for shipping and all. I definitely recommend this. Yeah, you could get a much better chip but those run for a lot more.
 
#11 ·
Hello All,

I just saw this thread and wanted to share my experience using a Volo VP 16 w and without HHO.

The vehicle is an 05 Touareg 3.2VR6.
It had 180k on it and the timing chain was shot. This didnt deter me as I am a Millwright by trade and used to moonlight as an MB mechanic at a private shop for many years. Thanks to Jazec our 30+ year engine guy we pulled the engine, found a bunch of monkey business, fixed it all and put her back together with a manual timing chain tensioner. Its my opinion the guides fail prematurely from the chain being over tight all the time but thats just my opinion and a different topic.

I bought a Bob Boyce designed HHO kit and Volo16 as the VP16 can be mapped to control the PWM(pulse width modulator) duty cycle. I had great success using HHO on my 96 VW Transporter diesel (approx30% better mileage) with only an on off button. The engine requires more or less hho depending on rpm/maf and they got this worked out with the VP 16.

My baseline was 17.3L/100km combined mostly city some hwy. I walk my dogs daily so the route doesn't change much. With the VP 16 alone I noted a few things. More power down low. Better mileage 14.6L/100kms and it doesnt shift down into 5th from 6th nearly as much anymore. I checked off economy and no towing during calibration.

With the HHO I have the above and more. Power is even better and mileage also at a consistent 13.8L/100km combined city hwy. However I tend to step on it a bit more now. Its just more fun to drive.

My conclusion is the VP16 works. I never had a chance to drive the vehicle much before doing the chain. Afterwards I realized how underpowered the VR6 3.2 is for this rather heavy vehicle. The auto journals called it “anemic”. I agree. So there was terrible fuel economy And not enough power. Both are much better and tolerable now thanks to this mod. All else is stock except a cold air filter. This I added to the airbox for extremely cold periods -5C and less. The ECU enriches the hell out of this engine in cold weather. The filter simply glued into a hole in the front of the airbox and intakes some of the underhood heat. When the weather warms up I block this filter.

I have read quite a few negative comments about chips and scams which may or may not be true. The underlying thought is that auto engineers are funded better and much more experienced in engine tuning than these chip programmers and theres no way a chip will enhance the work done by the factory. This SHOULD be true. However engineers, engineer for the parameters they are given. Not for what you personally want. One parameter is to keep Cat converters at “operating temperatures” this requires adding fuel that would not otherwise be required. The 05 v6 T has three cats that require this. The other parameter that is largely ignored is that liquid fuel does not burn. Only vapour ignites and only below the saturation for ignition. By injecting fuel close to or even inside the ignition chamber it is wasting liquid fuel which has not atomized and doesnt until after the combustion stroke. This keeps the cats hot but wastes a ton of fuel.

The auto engineers can and have made much more efficient vehicles. In the 30s they made a v16 that crossed the country at 200mpg in a vehicle that weighed quite a bit more than out Touaregs. Using only vapour and not liquid fuel could make for very efficient ICEs indeed. However that parameter is never given to our current crop of engineers who would like to keep their jobs. :)
 
#13 ·
Works fine for me :) I also have a Volo VS2 on my MB E430, over the last two years. The baseline was 14.3L/100km now it gets 12.8L/100km indicated. without HHO Just HHO gave me approx. 30% better mileage on my VW Van. However I like adding acetone to the diesel now instead so I sent it to Volo where they reprogrammed the FS2 for my E430 for free and sent it back.

Also when it comes to HHO the design of the cell and the PWM driving it is most important. Look up Bob Boyce. He is the career dod scientist that designed the cell I use. It works as advertised.

This year I attached all the components of the older HHO unit (called a B3 cell) to a couple of pieces of ply and made it portable. Then tried it in the old Mercruiser 165. (gm inline 6) Top speed went from 55kmph to 60 kmph and redline went from 4300 to 5200. HHO alone. This engine has zero electronics. Anyone that knows these engines knows its almost impossible to get them to rev higher than 4300 without modifications.

Anyone else here that has tried the Volo or hho?
 
#15 ·
Incorrect.
Cell and PWM designs have been engineered to produce four times the output gas per watt than when Faraday put two sheets of stainless in a bucket of water. In fact the system uses about 10 amps at full G/sec maf and load and only 1-2 amps at idle. At 2500rpm its at 3-4 amps. Many engineers have made systems that pull energy out of the energetic soup that surrounds us. This is one. Its not getting out more than you put in, its using what you put in to pull more energy from outside the system into, in this case, making HHO gas.

One of the early pioneers in prooving the energy of the aether is Wilhelm Reich. His work is enough info to keep one busy for a couple of months. Of course he has been slandered and theres quite a bit of bunk out there about him but his work is duplicatable

From my understanding to make even more gas you need resonance in the HHO generator. This has run ICEs before but gets the inventors pepe slapped or worse. For the record I have not and do not intend to do this. I just want better mileage.

As for chips. Saying all chips are bunk is like saying all cars are unreliable. There seems to be a chip for each day of the month. I can only relate what I have observed, and that is, the volo chips works for me and worked on three different vehicles.

The 05 Touareg VR6 mixed driving
baseline 17.3L/100kms
w VP16 and HHO 13.8L/100kms

The 01 MB E430 wife driving with leaded pedals!!
baseline 14.3L/100kms
with Volo FS2 only 12.8L/100kms

1996 VW Transporter diesel
approx. 30% better mileage
with HHO alone.

Those are observed facts.

In order to create you need first to have the thought that it can indeed be done. We are only self limiting when we fall for lie that we are tethered......
 
#16 ·
Do you understand how these ECU's work, and what control their is over them via obd? There is nothing that is alterable over obd. With a bi directional scan tool, you can turn on/off valves, injectors etc, but you cannot change the fuelling, timing. These little things that plug/wire into the obd port are not bi directional, and have no effect on anything whatsoever.

As I said, look up the guy that has pulled them apart. Hell, open yours up, see what inside, look up the data sheet for the maybe one IC, and realise it doesn't have the capability of doing what is claimed.

Regarding your hydrogen, sure sounds like a perpetual motion machine...
 
#21 ·
Almost a year and you still haven't looked into anything. Its trolls like you that dissuade discussion away from what could be an informative conversation. I have contributed actual observations on the ops topic. What have you contributed? Nothing! You need to remap Your ecu. Not enough fuel and to much hot air coming out.
Good bye club Trolllegg!
 
#22 ·
Wow I signed up just to give my 02 to that arrogant idiot. "You'll never find what you aren't looking for". Let the hater call my way. And no I'm not a troll.

I was leary at 1st but for the cheap investment the VOLO was a fun, inexpensive risk. I bought a fs2 for my Sienna van 3.3. I'm presently fiddling with HHO and this simple plug n play modification is a first step with or w/o HHO so what the heck. Over 500 miles I've boosted my mixed average mpg from 18.7 to 21.4. 15%+-. Yes thats paper and pencil. The van I've noticed doesnt have the typical Toyota hydro carbon smell at idle as it did before. Being a past smog tech. thats telling me it most likely ran a bit fat (rich misfire) with stock tune

I was searching the internet for VOLO reviews. This was one of the few reviews I could find. The reviews seem to run along the same line. First theres an honest interested party, next the cocky arrogant fool. Its kind of weird. I truely have seen legit benifit
 
#24 ·
🤔🤔🤔🤔