I think your front should be something like:
0JA weight category front axle weight range 1
0JB weight category front axle weight range 2
Yip, sorry. My mistake. My Part No.'s & PR Codes are:
7L6 411 105 K (FRONT) PR-1BA+
0JA
7L6 511 115 F (REAR) PR-1BA+0YB
For the '04 Treg, there are 7 different front springs:
7L6 411 105 K (1BA+0JA)
7L6 411 105 L (1BA+0JB)
7L6 411 105 M (1BA+0JD, 0JE)
7L6 411 105 T (1BA+0JF, 0JG)
7L6 411 105 S (1BE+0JA)
7L6 411 105 Q (1BE+0JB, 0JC)
7L6 411 105 R (1BE+0JD, 0JE, 0JF, 0JG)
...and 6 different rears:
7L6 511 115 F (1BA+0YA, 0YB)
7L6 511 115 K (1BA+0YC, 0YD)
7L6 511 115 Q (1BA+0YE, 0YF)
7L6 511 115 M (1BE+0YA, 0YB)
7L6 511 115 N (1BE+0YC, 0YD)
7L6 511 115 P (1BE+0YE, 0YF)
1BE is "sports-type suspension", whatever that means...
0JA-0JG is front axle weight range 1-7
0YA-0YF is rear axle weight range 1-6
hotponyshoes, you're right. You could possibly fit a slightly thicker wire by modifying the spring seats, but once again, I'd like to avoid that if possible. The front and rear setups are very similar, except that the rears are angled inwards alot more. The top mounts are basically next to the rear diff.
I'm at the bottom of the weight ranges, as I have an R5 with not too many weight adding options, so the easiest would've been to go up a weight range or two. Problem is my local dealer don't keep these in stock and I'll have to pay up front if I want them ordered and I've got no idea what difference each weight range will make. At $150 a spring this isn't really an option. Now, if I had the spring rates....
I do agree with you that the springs are overloaded and that's why they're sagging, but I still believe it's got nothing to do with the design or length of the spring. It all boils down to manufacturing processes and materials used. I don't carry heavy loads or tow a heavy trailer. It's normally just me and a bit of kit. The most cargo I've ever had in the Treg was less than 400kg.
If it takes a load of, say, 200kg to compleatly compress (bind) a spring you could make a spring a mile long and it would still only take a load of 200kg to crush it.
I disagree with this. If the spring rate is the same for the two springs and you put the same load on it, the compressed length of the longer spring will be more than the compressed length of the shorter one. The difference will remain constant, because k is constant. However, this does not necessarily apply anymore when the spring comes close to its fully compressed length. The material could come close to its plastic limit and start deforming. The theory also falls apart when the pitch of the coils are extreme, but for this case, where the long spring is only 6.7% longer I think it's still a safe assumption to make.
I do agree with you that I'll probably end up with a slightly stronger/stiffer spring. The question is, how am I going to obtain the extra stiffness. But I'll leave that up to the manufacturer.
Incidentally, the spring seats are common for all models with steel suspension, regardless of the weight range. This means that the wire thickness is the same for all. The only way they could change the stiffness is by changing the material structure with heat treatment, or by adding more coils.