The last direct electronically controlled link to boost is the connection to the N75 isn't it .,.. ?
Yes.
AND ...I have used VCDS and a vacuum gauge to interrogate the on / off action of the N75 which it did.
Okay....
So I'm at a bit of a loss to understand what is triggering the P0299 ...
The fault occurs because the boost pressure measured by the MAP sensor (ie. "Turbo boost pressure (actual)" or similar in VCDS) falls several hundreds of millibars short of what the engine thinks the boost pressure should be (ie. "Turbo boost pressure (requested)" or similar in VCDS). The engine's "expected" boost pressure values are based on or calculated from the intake air mass, temperature, the RPM of the engine and the temperature of the exhaust, which determine how fast the turbocharger spool and how much air it compresses.
However, this error condition has to persist for longer than pre-determined period of time, and it also has to be more severe than a pre-set threshold (usually 2-300 mbars), for the fault code to be raised and for the engine controller to go into limp mode (which is a deliberate decision by the ECU to limit engine output in order to prevent further damage). So, if the boost pressure only lags a few seconds or it's only below expected by 50-80 mbars, the fault is not triggered, because it doesn't fall out of tolerance bounds, yet.
Now, even though the engine can detect that there's an error condition, but it can't possibly know why it's there, because this type of problem (ie. the boost pressure not reaching expected levels) can have several reasons, like
- the vacuum system not working properly
- the N75 valve not working properly
- the turbocharger not working properly
- all of the vacuum system, the N75 valve and the turbocharger working properly, and proper boost being generated initially, but then escaping somewhere before it actually gets to the intake manifold (ie. having a boost leak somewhere)
- the MAP sensor reporting false readings
There's no way for the engine to verify ("double-check") any of these, or to distinguish between these, and they all result in the same thing: the boost pressure not reaching expected levels. Also, several factors could be adding up, like there could be both a slight problem with the vacuum system or the N75 solenoid valve, and also a slight boost leak (for ex. a crack in the charge air hose) - both of which could be possibly not be severe enough on their own to trigger the fault, but together might "add up" to a problem that's beyond tolerances.
That's where the mechanic/owner comes into the picture, who needs to subject the car's parts and systems to a complex diagnosis to either exclude some of these possible problems, leading him to the remaining culprit(s) by exclusion, or directly confirm the non-working or faulty state of some of these components. This what the smoke test, the vacuum test, the turbo actuator test, and boost pressure log are there for, which all yield information leading to a possible conclusion of where the problem lies.
I hope this clarifies what tests are or might be needed, what's the rationale behind executing these test to find the actual bad part in the car that needs fix or replacement, or why just testing the N75 valve or the vacuum system (especially when taken out of the car) might not be sufficient or might not lead to a positive identification of the actual culprit or to all of the culprits causing the trouble.
.the car is not lacking in power apart from when that fault occurs ..
The car is
apparently not lacking of power, because to a certain point the ECU can compensate for the problems. For ex. it can increase the RPM of the engine, increase the duration the turbo is spun for, or start spinning the turbo sooner than would otherwise, in order to still generate the same level of
apparent power to the driver; who in turn will not notice any
obvious problems with a car, despite some or more parts already not working properly and not performing how it or they should.
But the ECU can only compensate to a certain point - and when it's not able to do so anymore (because some problems get out of tolerance bounds), that's when it triggers the fault code and goes into limp mode. Which, as said, is not the result of the lack of turbo boost directly, just a deliberate decision by the ECU to limit the engine's output to a safe level, in order to avoid further or more severe damage to it.